Stop Quoting These Stats at the Bar: Five Numbers That Are Lying to You
Photo by Photo by hakim rahman on Unsplash on Unsplash
Look, nobody's saying you need to run regressions before arguing about football at work. But some stats get repeated so often that they've warped how fans see the game. Here are five culprits — and the honest numbers you should reach for instead.
1. Quarterback Rating (The Original Sin)
The NFL's passer rating formula was cooked up in the 1970s and produces a scale where 158.3 is "perfect," which tells you everything you need to know. Worse, it ignores rushing, sacks, and pressure entirely.
Watch instead: EPA per play or success rate. EPA (expected points added) asks a simple question: did this play make scoring more or less likely? It's the closest thing football has to an honest scoreboard for individual plays. You don't need to calculate it — just look it up and compare.
2. Pitcher Wins
A starter throws six shutout innings, leaves with a 1-0 lead, the bullpen blows it, and he gets a no-decision. Meanwhile, a guy gets lit up for five runs but his offense bails him out and he "earns" a win. Same stat column, wildly different performances.
Watch instead: FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching). FIP only counts what the pitcher controls — strikeouts, walks, home runs. It answers the question "how good is this guy, really?" without punishing him for a bad shortstop.
3. Plus-Minus in Basketball
The idea sounds fair: how does the score move while a player is on the floor? The problem is context. Put a star on the court with four bench players against a rival's starters, and his plus-minus gets destroyed through no fault of his own.
Watch instead: EPM, RAPTOR, or estimated plus-minus models. These adjust for teammates and opponents. Even better for casual viewing: just watch whether a team's offense has flow when a player checks in. Some things the eye catches that raw plus-minus can't.
4. Batting Average
A .300 hitter who hits all singles is less valuable than a .260 hitter who draws walks and smacks doubles. Yet batting average remains the default measure of a hitter, which is why half of baseball Twitter undervalues guys like Juan Soto types whose real skill is refusing to make outs.
Watch instead: OPS or, if you're feeling ambitious, wRC+. OPS (on-base plus slugging) is two numbers stapled together, and it captures far more of what actually scores runs. It's the lowest-effort upgrade in all of sports analytics.
5. Running Back Rushing Yards
"1,200-yard back" sounds impressive until you realize rushing totals depend enormously on the offensive line, game script, and volume. A mediocre back behind a great line piles up stats; a great back behind a bad line gets called a bust.
Watch instead: Yards before contact per attempt, or success rate by down. Yards before contact splits the credit between the runner and the five guys in front of him. Suddenly those "elite" 1,400-yard seasons behind an All-Pro line look a little different.
The Bigger Point
None of this means old-school stats are worthless — they're history, and history matters. But when a number was designed before color TV and we're still using it to settle arguments in 2025, that's a problem.
The good news? Every one of these modern alternatives is freely available on sites like FanGraphs, PFF, or Cleaning the Glass. You don't have to understand the math. You just have to know which number to say out loud the next time someone insists pitcher wins mean something.
Your group chat will thank you.
